Daihatsu Materia 1.5 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 VVT-i (2024)

HOME page / compare / Daihatsu Materia 1.5 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 VVT-i

Compare two cars

Compare any two cars and get our Virtual Adviser™ opinion

Car #1

Make

Model

Variant

Engine

Car #2

Make

Model

Variant

Engine


compare selected cars

DaihatsuMateria 1.5

ToyotaUrban Cruiser 1.3 VVT-i

2007. - 2012.

M - MPV

MPV, 5 door

front

Badges

Production

Vehicle class

Body style

Wheel drive

Safety

2009. - 2014.

M - MPV

MPV, 5 door

front

Marketing

Dimensons & Outlines

3800 mm

1690 mm

1635 mm

294 liters

294 liters

40 liters

Length

Width

Height

Boot (min)

Boot (max)

Fuel tank

3930 mm

1725 mm

1525 mm

314 liters

749 liters

42 liters

What is this telling me (?)

2007 Daihatsu Materia

2009 Toyota Urban Cruiser

Daihatsu Materia 1.5 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 VVT-i (8) Daihatsu Materia 1.5 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 VVT-i (9)

© GAMA1 Solutions. Copying & distribution prohibited.

Engine

Toyota / Daihatsu
1.5 3SZ-VE

Petrol

4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder

Nat. Asp.

1495 cc

105 hp

140 Nm

Engine

Fuel

Configuration

Aspiration

Displacement

Power

Torque

Petrol

4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder

Nat. Asp.

1329 cc

98 hp

123 Nm

Performance (manual gearbox)

manual gearbox - 5 gears

1035 kg

10.8 s

170 km/h

8.9 l/100km

6.1 l/100km

7.2 l/100km

g/km

Gearbox type

Vehicle weight

Acc. 0-100

Top speed

Cons. (urban)

Cons. (highway)

Cons. (average)

CO2 emissions

manual gearbox - 6 gears

1105 kg

12.5 s

175 km/h

6.6 l/100km

4.9 l/100km

5.5 l/100km

129 g/km

Performance (automatic gearbox)

automatic - 4 gears

1050 kg

13.7 s

164 km/h

9.5 l/100km

6.2 l/100km

7.5 l/100km

g/km

Gearbox type

Vehicle weight

Acc. 0-100

Top speed

Cons. (urban)

Cons. (highway)

Cons. (average)

CO2 emissions

kg

s

km/h

l/100km

l/100km

l/100km

g/km

Expenses

3000 EUR

Price from

5500 EUR

Virtual Adviser's™ opinion

Overview

Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It's only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the mpv segment and utilize the same 5-door MPV body style and the front wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific petrol engine choice they offer. Both the engines are Toyota-engineered . The first one has a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 105hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 98hp one.

Safety

Both vehicles got tested by European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP), with the Daihatsu being a slightly better choice apparently. That aside, let's consider some other aspects which affect safety. Both vehicles belong to the mpv segment, which is generally a good thing safety-wise, but that fact doesn't break the tie between the two cars. On the other hand, if we'd like to consider vehicle mass in this context too, which we definitely should, Urban Cruiser offers a marginal difference of 7% more metal.

Reliability

Manufacturers have been building their reliability reputation for decades now and, generally speaking, it appears that Daihatsu does have a slight advantage, at least on all of the models level. These are the results of an independent reasearch, while our visitors describe reliability of Daihatsu with an average rating of 4.1, and models under the Toyota badge with 4.6 out of 5. Unfortunatelly, I don't have enough insight that would allow me to comment in more details on the specific models level. Above it all, drivers of cars with the same engine as Materia rank it on average as 4.5, while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets 4.6 out of 5.

Performance & Fuel economy

Daihatsu is undoubtly more agile, reaching 100km/h in 1.7 seconds less than its competitor. Still, it lacks the power to win the top speed competition, topping at 170 kilometers per hour, 5km/h less than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy the winner has to be Urban Cruiser, averaging around 5.5 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (51 mpg), in combined cycle. We can't ignore that 31% difference compared to Materia.


Verdict

Daihatsu appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, Materia offers slightly better overall protection and takes the lead. It all continues in the same direction, with Daihatsu being considerably quicker, thus putting more smile on driver's face. It does come at a cost though, and that's the fuel consumption... At the end, as much as I'd like to give you a winner here, it's simply a pure tie if you ask me. Anyway, that's the most objective conclusion I could've came up with and it's based solely on the information found on this website. Aspects such as design, practicality, brand value and driving experience are there for you to measure them out. In case you have two minutes to spare I invite you to define your needs, desires and budget and see which car would be chosen by the virtual adviser, among thousands of similar, yet so different vehicles.

Check a car by its VIN number

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands

1.565different vehicle models

2.275engines

14.080specific cars

Daihatsu Materia  1.5 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser  1.3 VVT-i (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Tyson Zemlak

Last Updated:

Views: 6216

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (63 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Tyson Zemlak

Birthday: 1992-03-17

Address: Apt. 662 96191 Quigley Dam, Kubview, MA 42013

Phone: +441678032891

Job: Community-Services Orchestrator

Hobby: Coffee roasting, Calligraphy, Metalworking, Fashion, Vehicle restoration, Shopping, Photography

Introduction: My name is Tyson Zemlak, I am a excited, light, sparkling, super, open, fair, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.